Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 1;10(8):1–64.
Table 1: Characteristics of meta-analyses included in systematic review by Heijenbrok-Kal, 2007*
Table 2: Quality of evidence of included studies
Table 3: Pooled accuracy estimates of included trials stratified by study characteristic
Table 4: Tests of significance between SPECT subgroups
Table 5 Diagnostic GRADE evaluation of methodological quality of included trials
Table 6 Diagnostic GRADE evaluation of methodological quality of included trials
Table 7: Total effective dose of various cardiac diagnostic procedures
Table 8: Summary incremental cost-effectiveness ratios across selected studies evaluating SPECT
Table 9: Parameter estimates for SPECT tests: sensitivity, specificity; additional days needed to wait for cardiac tests; proportion of non-invasive tests considered uninterpretable
Table 10: List of cardiac imaging tests and associated OHIP 2009 costs
Table 11: Cost-effectiveness analysis base case results for stable outpatients
Table 12: Cost-effectiveness analysis base case results for acute inpatients
Table A1: Characteristics of included studies comparing the accuracy of SPECT to CA for the diagnosis of CAD