Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 1;8(5):1–49.

Table 2: Overview of Quantitative Studies Involving Interventions Targeting Social Isolation in Community-Dwelling Seniors*.

Author, Year Region, Country Target Group Sample Characteristics Funding Source
1. Andersson 1985 (24) Stockholm, Sweden On wait lists for senior apartments 108 F Mean age 77 y Delegation for Social Research & City of Stockholm
2. Arnetz and Theorell 1983 (29) Stockholm, Sweden Residents of senior apartments 60 (40 F + 20 M) Mean age 77.6 y Delegation for Social Research & City of Stockholm
3. Hopman-Rock and Westoff 2002 (31) Leiden, Netherlands Physically inactive 390 (320 F + 70 M) Mean age 72.3 y Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports, Pfizer, Leerdammer Cheese, & health insurance companies (Zilveren Kruis Achmea & Groene Land Achmea)
4. McAuley et al. 2000 (32) Illinois, United States Physically inactive 174 (125 F + 49 M) Mean age 65.5 y National Institute on Aging
5. Caserta and Lund 1993 (30) Utah, United States Bereaved 339 (239 F + 100 M) Mean age 67.2 y National Institute on Aging
6. Rosen and Rosen 1982 (33) Georgia, United States Mental distress 117 (95 F + 22 M) Median age 70 y Administration on Aging, Office Human Development
7. Morrow-Howell et al. 1998 (22) St. Louis, Missouri, United States Mental health crisis 61 (52 F + 9 M) Mean age 77 y The Retirement Research Foundation
8. Heller et al. 1991 (23) Indiana, United States Low income & low social support 291 F Mean age 74 y National Institute Mental Health
9. Tesch-Romer et al. 1997 (34) Greifswald, Germany Hearing impaired 148 (77 F + 71 M) Mean age 71 y German Research Foundation
10. Brennan et al. 1995 (25) Cleveland, Ohio, United States Informal caregivers 102 (68 F + 34 M) Median age 64 y National Institute on Aging
11. Winter and Gitlin 2007 (35) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Informal caregivers 103 F Mean age 66 y Alzheimer’s Association
*

F indicates female; M, male; y; years.