Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 1;8(2):1–78.

Executive Summary Table 1: Summary of Meta-Analyses of Studies Investigating the Effectiveness of Interventions on the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Seniors*.

Intervention RR [95% CI] GRADE
Exercise programs
  1. Targeted programs    
      General population 0.81 [0.67–0.98] Low
      High-risk population 0.93 [0.82–1.06] High
      Short duration 0.91 [0.73–1.13] High
      Long duration 0.89 [0.79–1.01] Moderate
  2. Untargeted programs    
      General population 0.78 [0.66–0.91] Moderate
      High-risk population 0.89 [0.72–1.10] Very low
      Short duration 0.85 [0.71–1.01] Low
      Long duration 0.76 [0.64–0.91] Moderate
  3. Combined targeted vs. untargeted programs    
      General population N/A N/A
      High-risk population 0.87 [0.57–1.34] Moderate
      Short duration 1.11 [0.73–1.70] High
      Long duration 0.73 [0.57–0.95] High
Vision intervention
      Assessment/referral 1.12 [0.82–1.53] Moderate
      Cataract surgery 1.11 [0.92–1.35] Moderate
Environmental modifications
      Low-risk population 1.03 [0.75–1.41] High
      High-risk population 0.66 [0.54–0.81] High
      General population 0.85 [0.75–0.97] High
Drugs/Nutritional supplements
      Vitamin D (men and women) 0.94 [0.77–1.14] High
      Vitamin D (women only) 0.55 [0.29–1.08] Moderate
      Vitamin D and calcium (men and women) 0.89 [0.74–1.07] Moderate
      Vitamin D and calcium (women only) 0.83 [0.73–0.95] Moderate
      Hormone replacement therapy 0.98 [0.80–1.20] Low
      Medication withdrawal 0.34 [0.16–0.74] Low
Gait-stabilizing device 0.43 [0.29–0.64] Moderate
Multifactorial intervention
      Geriatric screening (general population) 0.87 [0.69–1.10] Very low
      High-risk population 0.86 [0.75–0.98] Low
*

CI refers to confidence interval; RR, relative risk.

Hazard ratio is reported, because RR was not available.