Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 1;10(1):1–44.

Table 5: Efficacy of nursing interventions on abstinence from smoking at ≥6 months follow up.

Comparison Details RR abstinence from smoking at ≥6 months follow up (95% CI) I2
Advice vs. Control (subgroups by intensity) 31 trials, N=15,205 1.28 (1.18, 1.38) 54%*
      1. High intensity 24 trials, N=11,189 1.28 (1.18, 1.39) 59%
      2. Low intensity 7 trials, N=4016 1.27 (0.99, 1.62) 36%
Advice vs. control (subgroups by setting & population)
      1. Intervention as part of multifactorial intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease 4 trials, N= 482 1.39 (1.17, 1.65) 0%
      2. Intervention alone in hospitalized smokers with a cardiovascular disease 7 trials, N= 2278 1.29 (1.14, 1.45) 50%
      3. Intervention alone in other hospitalized smokers 5 trials, N= 4401 1.04 (0.89, 1.22) 0%
      4. Intervention alone in non-hospitalized smokers with a cardiovascular disease 1 trials, N= 255 0.35 (0.20, 0.60)
      5. Intervention alone in other non-hospitalized smokers 14 trials, N= 7664 1.84 (1.49, 2.28) 12%

RR refers to relative risk; CI, confidence interval; I2 refers to test for heterogeneity

*

Subsequent analysis excluding three outlying trials lowered the I2 to 17% and produced an RR of 1.27 (1.18, 1.38)

Subgroup analysis showed that smokers who had undergone bypass surgery were more likely to quit and were over-represented in the control group