Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;19(Suppl 1):S64–S72. doi: 10.3747/co.19.1068

TABLE II.

Phase iii maintenance trials with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Agent Reference (study name) Regimen Screened (n) Randomized (n) pfs (months) os (months)
Switch maintenance
  Erlotinib
Miller et al., 200924 (atlas) Platinum doublet–bev → bev–erlotinib 1160 768 4.8 15.9
Platinum doublet–bev → bev–placebo 3.7 13.9
(p=0.0012) (p=0.27)
Cappuzzo et al., 201025 (saturn) Platinum doublet × 4 → erlotinib 1949 889 3.1 12
Platinum doublet × 4 → placebo 2.8 11
(p<0.0001) (p=0.01)
Perol et al., 201026 (ifct-gfpc 0502) Cisplatin–gemcitabine → erlotinib nr 310 2.8 nr
Cisplatin–gemcitabine → observation 2.1 nr
(p=0.002)
  Gefitinib
Gaafar et al., 201027 (eortc 08021–ilcp 01/03) Platinum doublet × 4 → gefitinib 173 173 4.1 10.9
Platinum doublet × 4 → placebo 2.9 9.4
(p=0.0015) (p=0.2)
Takeda et al., 201028 (wjtog 0203) Platinum doublet × 3 → gefitinib 598 598 4.6 13.7
Platinum doublet × 6 4.3 12.9
(p<0.001) (p=0.11)
Zhang et al., 201129 (inform) Platinum doublet × 4 → gefitinib 298 296 4.8 18.7
Platinum doublet × 4 → placebo 2.6 16.9
(p<0.0001) (p=0.26)
Continuation maintenance
None designed

pfs = progression-free survival; os = overall survival; bev = bevacizumab; nr = not reported.