Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 11;21(Suppl 5):630–640. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1650-0

Table 1.

Vertebral translation at normal levels (data from literature), untreated levels (below or above treated levels), mobile-core implanted levels and fixed-core implanted levels

Normal levels Untreated levels Mobile-core implanted levels Fixed-core implanted levels Differences between each group*
L3L4 −1.22 ± 0.60
n = 58
−1.29 ± 1.02
n = 46
N versus U NS
L4L5 −1.03 ± 0.48 −1.20 ± 1.28 −1.10 ± 0.59 −1.74 ± 0.71 N versus U NS
n = 49 n = 29 n = 21 n = 15 N versus M NS
N versus F p < 0.001
U versus M NS
U versus F NS p = 0.08
M versus F p < 0.001
L5S1 +0.03 ± 0.97 +1.07 ± 1.61 −0.79 ± 0.44 −1.61 ± 0.4 N versus U p = 0.02
n = 37 n = 17 n = 35 n = 18 N versus M p < 0.001
N versus F p < 0.001
U versus M p < 0.001
U versus F p < 0.001
M versus F p < 0.001
L4L5 versus L5S1 ML4L5 versus ML5S1 p = 0.002
FL4L5 versus FL5S1 NS

n number of cases available, N normal levels, U untreated levels, M mobile-core implanted levels, F fixed-core implanted levels, NS not significant (p > 0.05)

* The Wilcoxon test was used to compare U and M and F. The Student test was used to compare N to all the other levels. Vertebral translation is expressed in millimeter for 10° of range of motion. Means ± standard deviation are shown