Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 24;15(4):657–665. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0494-x

Table 1.

Number of object retrievals consistent with the label and the pointing gesture in all conditions

Object selection
Labeled object Pointed-to object Next to pointed-to objecta Other
Paddy
Pointing Baseline (N = 43) 22 (51 %)*** 7 (16 %) 14 (33 %)
Familiar Label Baseline (N = 47) 42 (89 %)*** 5 (11 %)
Mutual Exclusivity (N = 12) 10 (83 %)*** 2 (17 %)
Ostensive Naming (N = 12) 9 (75 %)*** 3 (25 %)b
Familiar Label Conflict (N = 10) 7 (70 %)** 2 (20 %) 1 (10 %)
Novel Label Conflict (N = 12) 7 (58 %)** 1 (8 %) 4 (34 %)
Betsy

Pointing Baseline (N = 42)

N = 54

19 (35 %)** 6 (11 %) 29 (54 %)
Familiar Label Baseline (N = 46) 43 (94 %)*** 3 (6 %)
Mutual Exclusivity (N = 11) 2 (18 %) 9 (82 %)
Ostensive Naming (N = 12) 7 (58 %)** 4 (34 %)c 1 (8 %)
Familiar Label Conflict (N = 12) 8 (67 %)** 4 (33 %)
Novel Label Conflict (N = 11) 6 (55 %)* 3 (27 %) 2 (18 %)

Asterisks indicate performance significantly above chance level. Cells are blank when this option was not available in a condition * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

aNext to pointed-to object is the labeled object in conflict conditions (except for one case for Paddy in the Novel Label Conflict condition)

b2 times the novel object next to the pointed-to novel object, 1 time the familiar object on the other side

c3 times the novel object next to the pointed-to object, 1 time the familiar object on the other side