Table 4.
Type I and II error rates for the different methods
| PAR-OFF + SIB | SIB only | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | Permuted pedigree1 | Type I | Type II | Type I | Type II |
| PAR-OFF | 1% | 0.0019 | 0.2970 | ||
| 10% | 0.0210 | 0.3098 | |||
| 25% | 0.0532 | 0.3409 | |||
| SIBCOUNT | 1% | 0.0001 | 0.2452 | 0.0003 | 0.0870 |
| 10% | 0.0055 | 0.0516 | 0.0252 | 0.0534 | |
| 25% | 0.0269 | 0.0717 | 0.0920 | 0.0698 | |
| SIBREL | 1% | 0.0002 | 0.3132 | 0.0005 | 0.1421 |
| 10% | 0.0053 | 0.0981 | 0.0239 | 0.1295 | |
| 25% | 0.0240 | 0.1127 | 0.0782 | 0.1256 | |
Methods SIBCOUNT and SIBREL were either preceded by deleting animals causing parent-offspring inconsistencies (PAR-OFF) or not
1Pedigree data was permuted against genotype data for either 1%, 10%, or 25%