Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 Feb 7;54:679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.048

Table 3. Statistical Analysis.

t-Test to determine significant differences between the VOC sensor and reference methods

Validation Test VOC Sensora Reference Method t-test Significant Difference (p = 0.05)
SIFT - MS
Sample 1 (n=3) 195 177 -1.247 NO
Sample 2 (n=3) 264 259 -0.346 NO
Sample 3 (n=3) 371 382 0.762 NO
Sample 4 (n=3) 535 585 1.575 NO
GC-FID
Sample 1 (n=3) 22 19.4 -1.098 NO
Sample 2 (n=3) 10.8 13.6 1.183 NO
Sample 3 (n=2) 12.5 13.6 1.296 NO
a

concentration of VOC in ppb xylenes for SIFT-MS (Selected ion flow – mass spectrometry), and ppbC for GC-FID (Gas chromatography – flame ionization detection), AQDX method; n: number of readings per sample.