Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 7;9(2):199–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00341.x

Table 4.

 Associations between breastfeeding duration and age of starting solid feeding with high BMI (sex‐specific BMI >90th centile) and sum of skinfolds at 5 years in Mysore, South India, 1997–2003

Model* High BMI Sum of skinfolds
OR (95% CI) P‐value % change P‐value
Breastfeeding duration
 Unadjusted association for breastfeeding duration effect 0.87 (0.69 to 1.10) 0.26 –0.9 (–2.5 to 0.8) 0.31
 Model 1: socio‐economic characteristics 0.88 (0.69 to 1.11) 0.27 –0.8 (–2.5 to 0.8) 0.33
 Model 2: model 1 + household nutritional status 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07) 0.17 –1.0 (–2.6 to 0.7) 0.24
 Model 3: model 2 + family history of diabetes 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07) 0.17 –1.0 (–2.6 to 0.7) 0.25
 Model 4: model 3 + birth outcomes 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07) 0.17 –0.8 (–2.4 to 0.7) 0.37
 Model 5: model 4 + age of starting solid feeds 0.87 (0.68 to 1.11) 0.25 –0.6 (–2.2 to 1.1) 0.48
 Model 6: model 5 + child gender and current age 0.87 (0.68 to 1.11) 0.26 –0.6 (–2.2 to 1.0) 0.47
Age of starting solid feeds
 Unadjusted association for age of starting solid feeds effect 0.79 (0.58 to 1.07) 0.14 –2.2 (–4.3 to 0.0) 0.05
 Model 1: socio‐economic characteristics 0.79 (0.58 to 1.08) 0.15 –1.8 (–3.9 to 0.4) 0.10
 Model 2: model 1 + household nutritional status 0.77 (0.56 to 1.06) 0.10 –1.9 (–4.1 to 0.2) 0.08
 Model 3: model 2 + family history of diabetes 0.77 (0.56 to 1.05) 0.10 –1.9 (–4.0 to 0.2) 0.08
 Model 4: model 3 + birth outcomes 0.75 (0.56 to 1.05) 0.09 –0.9 (–2.6 to 0.7) 0.26
 Model 5: model 4 + breastfeeding duration 0.77 (0.56 to 1.08) 0.14 –1.8 (–3.9 to 0.4) 0.11
 Model 6: model 5 + child gender and current age 0.78 (0.56 to 1.09) 0.15 –1.7 (–3.7 to 0.4) 0.11

BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. OR and % change in sum of skinfolds are for a 1 category increase in breastfeeding (1–4, 5–8, 9–12, 13–16, 17–20 and 21+ months) and introduction of solids (≤3, 4, 5, 6+ months). To allow coefficients to be compared, all results are reported from the sample with complete data by each exposure (Final Model, n = 484). *Variables included in final regression models: socio‐economic characteristics (Block 1): urban dwelling status, Kuppuswamy score, maternal education; household nutritional status (Block 2): maternal BMI at 5‐year follow‐up; family history of diabetes; birth outcomes (Block 3): birthweight, gestational age; infant‐feeding practices (Block 4): either breastfeeding duration or age of starting solid feeds, child gender; current age at follow‐up. Estimated percentage change in the geometric mean of sum of skinfold thickness (subscapular and triceps) for a per category increase in exposure.