Table 3.
Encourage Trainees to Perform Routine HIV Screening aOR (95% CI)* | |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 1.0 (ref) |
Female | 0.83 (0.43, 1.59) |
Yrs since completion of training | |
< 10 | 1.0 (ref) |
10-19 | 0.65 (0.32, 1.31) |
≥ 20 | 0.89 (0.37, 2.14) |
Percent minority patients | |
0–30% | 1.0 (ref) |
31–60% | 0.96 (0.36, 2.57) |
≥ 61% | 1.31 (0.47, 3.70) |
Estimated HIV prevalence | |
< 0.1% | 1.0 (ref) |
0.1– 0.9% | 0.91 (0.39, 2. 08) |
≥1% | 1.40 (0.55, 3.60) |
Practice Setting | |
University Affiliated | 1.0 (ref) |
Non-university Affiliated | 0.90 (0.42, 1.93) |
VA Affiliated | 0.32 (0.13, 0.84) |
Knowledge Score | |
0 wrong | 1.0 (ref) |
1 wrong | 0.57 (0.29, 1.12) |
≥2 wrong | 0.20 (0.08, 0.46) |
Attitude toward Testing | |
No benefit to patients | 1.0 (ref) |
Benefits patients | 8.83 (4.21, 18.5) |
Percentage of Patients Screened | |
≤ 25% | 1.0 (ref) |
> 25% | 5.01 (1.90, 13.1) |
*aOR = adjusted odds ratio from multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for gender, years since completion of training, percent minority and uninsured patients in practice, estimated community HIV prevalence, practice setting, knowledge score, belief in benefit to patient and percentage of patient’s screened. CI = confidence interval