Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 1;6(17):1–121.

Table 9: Perioperative Outcomes. Electrovaporization Using Bipolar Energy Versus TURP.

Study, Year Operative time Mean (SD), Min Hospital stay Mean (SD), Days Catheterization time Mean (SD), Hours Hemoglobin decrease, Mean (SD), g/dL Transfusion, N (%) Intra-operative irrigant requirement, Mean (SD), L TUR syndrome No N (%) Irritative voiding symptoms N (%)
Hon et al. 2006 (93)
PKVP
TURP
Resection time
32.6 (13.4)
28.5 (15.2)
P = .08
3 (0.9)
3.4 (1.1)
NR 0.8 (0.9)
1.4 (1.3)
P =.002
0
4 (5.3)
NR 0
0
NR
De Sio et al. 2006 (66)
PKVP
TURP

PKVP
TURP
49
53
NS
Resection time:
33
39
NS
2.26
4.46
72
100
P <.05
0.8
1
1
0
NS
NR 0
0
NR
Nuhoglu et al. 2006 (64)
PKVP
TURP
55 (9.7)
52 (13.2)
NS
NR 47 (5.6)
75.7 (12.5)
P < .009
0.3
0.5
NS
1
2
NR 0
0
NR
Seckiner et al. 2006 (65)
PKVP
TURP
52.9 (12.8)
52.9 (16.3)
P =.835
NR 74.4 (33.6)
74.4 (14.4)
NS
0.6
1.5
0
0
8.3 (3.8)
6.9 (3.2)
P = .213
0
0
NR
Tefekli et al. 2005 (32)
PKVP
TURP
40.3 (11.4)
57.8 (13.4)
P <.01
NR 55.2 (16.8)
91.2 (16.8)
P <.05
NR 1
1
11.4 (45)
18.3 (13.6)
P <.05
0
0
6 (12.2)
2 (4.3)
Fung et al. 2005 (94)
PKVP
TURP
Resection time
36.6
32.9
P =.488
NR 27.36
29.04
P =.594
0.24
NR
NS
NR 11.6
12.2
P =.722
0
0
NR

NR refers to not reported; NS, not significant; PKVP, Plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate; SD, standard deviation; TUR, transurethral resection; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate