Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 1;6(17):1–121.

Table 12: Subjective Measures of Effectiveness, Visual Laser Ablation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

Study, Year IPSS, Mean (SD) QOL score, Mean (SD)
Baseline 7.5 months Baseline 7.5 months
Chacko et al. 2001(67)

VLAP
TURP
17.6 (9.3)
19.4 (7.6)
Mean change in quantitative scores (95% CI)
™10.06 (™12.80 to ™7.31)
13.52 (™15.81 to ™11.23)
P =.26
Categorical version *
Adjusted OR (95% CI): 2.14 (0.81–5.65)

P =.12
Median

5 (4.6)
5 (4.6)
Mean change (95% CI)

-3.10 (-3.65 to -2.55)
-3.42 (-3.89 to -2.95)
Gujral et al. 2000 (68)

VLAP
TURP
20.9 (6.4)
19.5 97.2)
Mean change in quantitative scores (95% CI)
-12.2 (-15.7 to -8.7)
-14.2 (-17.2 to -11.2)
P = .048
Categorical version*
Adjusted OR (95% CI):
3.9 (1−14.3) Favour TURP
Median
5 (2.6)
4.5 (2.6)
Mean change (95% CI)
-2.8 (-3.4 to -2.1)
-3.2 (-3.9 to -2.6)
P = .97
Donovan et al. 2000 (69)

VLAP
TURP
19.2 (6.7)
19.1 (6.6)
Mean change in quantitative scores (95% CI)
-10.8 (-12.5 to -9)
-12.3 (-13.8 to -10.7)
P >.05
Categorical version*
OR (95% CI): 2.4 (1.2–4.6)
P <.05 Favour TURP
Median

4
4
Mean change (95% CI)

-1.9 (-2.3 to -1.6)
-2.2 (-2.5 to -1.8)
*

Categories of good, moderate, poor

IPSS refers to International Prostate Symptom Score; NR, not reported; QOL, quality of life; SD, standard deviation; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate; VLAP, visual laser ablation of the prostate