Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 1;6(17):1–121.

Table 31: Patient Characteristics: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Versus TURP.

Study, Year Patients, No. (Treatment, control) Inclusion criteria Prostate size Mean (SD), mL Mean follow-up Years (months where specified) No. available for follow-up
Rigatti et al. 2006 (72) 100
(52, 48)
Patients with BPH younger than 72 years; prostate size 30–100 gr; Qmax <15 mL/s; PVR <100 mL, medical therapy failure; Schafer >2; obstruction on the International Continence Society nomogram, and Abram-Griffiths >40 HoLEP: 60.3 (36.7)
TURP: 56.2 (19.4)
P =.05
1 All
Gupta et al. 2006 (55)
3-arm study
100
(50, 50)
Plus 50 patients in TUVRP group
Patients with BPH who were candidates for TURP and gland size of >40 g HoLEP: 57.9 (17.6)
TURP: 59.8 (16.5)
1 NR
Kuntz et al. 2004 (39) 200
(100, 100)
Patients with BPH who had AUA symptom score ≥12; Qmax ≤12mL/s; PVR>50mL; Schafer grade ≥ 2; Prostate volume <100 cc HoLEP: 53.5 (20.0)
TURP: 49.9 (21.1)
1 HoLEP: 89
TURP: 86 (13 patients with incidental carcinoma and 8 who developed stricture were excluded from analysis)
Tan et al. 2003 (40) 61
(31, 30)
Patients with BPH who had prostate volume 40–200 mL; Qmax </=15 mL/s; AUA score >/=8; PVR <400 mL; Schafer grade ≥2 HoLEP: 77.8 (5.6)
TURP: 70.0 (5.0)
1 HoLEP: 25
TURP: 27

AUA refers to American Urological Association; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; NR, not reported; PVR, postvoid residual; Qmax, maximum flow rate; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate