Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 1;6(17):1–121.

Table 32: Subjective Measures of Effectiveness. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Versus TURP.

Study, Year IPSS, Mean (SD) QOL score, Mean (SD)
Baseline 3 months 6 months 12 months > 1 year Baseline 3 months 6 months 12 months > 1 year
Rigatti et al. 2006
(72)
HoLEP
TURP
21.6 (6.7)
21.9 (7.2)
P =.83
NR 3.9 (2.9)
2.9 (2.6)
P =.72
4.1 (2.3)
3.9 (3.6)
P = .58
NR 4.6 (1.1)
4.7 (1)
P = .7
NR 1 (8)
0.6 (0.2)
P =.25
1.4 (0.9)
0.8 (1.28)
P =.31
NR
Gupta et al. 2006
(55)
HoLEP
TURP
23.4 (4.5)
23.3 (3.9)
P > .05
NR 5.2 (0.31)
6.1 (0.42)
P > .05
5.2 (0.17)
5.6 (0.32)
P > .05
NR NR NR NR NR NR
Kuntz et al. 2004
(39)
HoLEP
TURP
22.1 (3.8)
21.4 (5.2)
P =.56
NR 2.2 (1.6)
3.7 (3.4)
P =.006
1.7 (1.8)
3.9 (3.9)
P =.0001
NR NR NR NR NR NR
Tan et al. 2003
(40)
HoLEP
TURP
26.0 (1.1)
23.7 (1.2)
P >.05
4.8 (0.8)
3.4 (0.9)
P >.05
6.0 (1.0)
4.8 (0.7)
P >.05
4.3 (0.7)
5.0 (0.9)
P >.05
NR 4.8 (0.2)
4.7 (0.2)
P >. 05
1.8 (0.4)
1.9 (0.6)
P >.05
1.6 (0.3)
1.5 (0.2)
P >.05
1.5 (0.5)
1.4 (0.3)
P >.05
NR

HoLEP refers to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; NR, not reported; QOL, quality of life; SD, standard deviation; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate