Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 1;6(17):1–121.

Table 48: Objective Outcome Measures of Effectiveness. Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy (TUMT) Versus TURP.

Study, Year Peak urinary flow (Qmax), Mean (SD), mL/s Postvoid residual urine, Mean (SD), mL
Baseline 3 months 6 months 1 year > 1 year Baseline 3 months 6 months 1 year > 1 year
Wagrell et al. 2004; & 2002 (76;79)
TUMT
TURP
7.6 (2.7)
7.9 (2.7)
P =NR
12.8 (6.1)
14.6 (9.0)
P =NR
13.5 (6.1)
13.8 (6.8)
P =NR
13.3 (6.0)
15.2 (7.8)
P = .565
2 years:

12.4
(5.3) 15.6
(9.6)
P = .020
3 years
11.9 (4.9)
13.5 (7.4)
P =.584
106 (77)
94 (82)
P =NR
NR NR 49 (70)
54 (77)
P = .68
2 years:

55 (63)
40 (48)
P = .340
3 years
47 (62)
54 (118)
P = .760
Norby et al. 2002 (56)
TUMT
TURP
9.1 (4.2)
9.6 (3.2)
0.639
NR 13.2 (6.9)
20.6 (12.8)
P = .019
NR NR 110
75
P = .273
NR 48
23
P = .013
NR NR
Floratos, et al. 2001
TUMT
TURP
9.2
7.6
NR NR 15.1
24.5
2 years

14.5 23
3 years
11.9 24.7
P =.000
34
61
NR NR 30
19
2 years

30
30
3 years
30
36
P < .05
Francisca et al 2000
TUMT
TURP
9.6 (3.0)
7.9 (2.8)
P < .01
15.5 (12.1)
25.0 (7.5)
P < .01
NR 15.2 (7.6)
23.5 (9.9)
P < .01
NR 64 (76)
84 (90)
P = 16
64 (76)
14 (21)
P < .01
NR 58 (72)
19 (51)
P =< .01
NR

NR refers to not reported; Qmax, maximum urinary flow; SD, standard deviation; TUMT, transurethral microwave thermotherapy; TURP transurethral resection of the prostate