Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 1;6(4):1–57.

Table 9: Changes in Harris Hip Scores, SF-12 Scores, UCLA Hip Scores, and Other Scores*.

Study Survival Rate
of the
Implant/
Components
%
Change in Harris Hip
Score
Change in SF-12
Scores
Change in
Oxford Hip
Score
Change in UCLA Hip
Score
De Smet 2005 (36) NR Preoperative: all < 60
At follow-up: 97.24 (41–100)
NR NR NR
Back et al. 2005 (37) NR Charnley category A*: 63.9-97.7
Charnley category B: 56.2-99.4
Charnley category C: 64.8-85.5
(C vs. A or B, P < .001)
SF-12 Physical
Charnley category A: 31.1-54.1
Charnley category B: 30.3-54.1
Charnley category C: 31.5-48.2
SF-12 Mental
Charnley category A: 58.6-56.9
Charnley category B: 60.5-57.7
Charnley category C: 52.2-55.9
NR NR
Treacy et al. 2005 (38) 98
(95% CI, 92-100)
NR NR At follow-up only: Median 2.1, interquartile range: 0-10.4 NR
Lilikakis et al. 2005 (39) 97.1, SD 0.02 Pain:
12 (0–30) to 39.3 (0–44)
(P < .0001)
Function:
28.3 (3–42) to 43.1 (9–47)
(P < .0001)
NR NR NR
Daniel et al. 2004 (35) 99.7 NR NR Mean score of surviving hips: 13.5 UCLA Activity Level: All patients who responded (97.6%) had a score of 5 or more indicating an active life style
Amstutz et al. 2004 (34) 94.4
(95% CI, 91-98)
Overall postoperative: 93.5 (41–100)
Charnley category A: 95.2 (61–100)
Charnley category B 93.3 (66–100)
(B vs. A P.008)
Charnley category C 80.7 (41–100)
C vs. A or B, P.001)
(C vs. A or B, P < .001)
SF-12 physical:
31.2 (16.8-54.8) to 50
(17.6-62.7) P < .0001
Mental: 46.8 (4–68.5) to 53.1
(10.5-67.1) P < .0001
NR NR
Beaule et al. 2004 (40) NR NR Physical: 29.9-47.7 (P =. 00)
Mental: 44.8-1.5 (P =. 00)
NR UCLA hip score
Pain: 3.1-9.1
Walking: 4.4-9.2
Function: 5.8-9.1
Activity: 5.5-7.1
(P =. 00)
Beaule et al. 2004 (41) 79 (95% CI, 65-92) NR NR NR UCLA hip score:
Pain: 3.9-9.3 (P < .05)
Walking: 6.2-9.2
Function: 5.8-8.5
Activity: 4.6-6.6
*

Charnley class A (affected one hip); Charnley class B and C (affected in both hips/other conditions directly impeding mobility); NR indicates not reported.