Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 1;6(12):1–97.
Study Objective Endpoints Design Follow-up Patients & Lesion Method Results Conclusion & Limitation
Park 2001 (32) Effect of debulking & IVUS guidance on elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis
Nov 1995 – April 2000
Procedural success: <30% residual diameter stenosis by QCA & no procedural or in hospital complications
Angiographic MLD, restenosis rates
MACE = cardiac death, non-fatal MI & TLR
Non-randomized observation al study
Patients IVUS 77 No IVUS 50
Use of IVUS @ discretion of the operator
Angiographic follow-up @ 6 months
Clinical following -up up to 2 years
Patients: Consecutive patients Inclusion criteria
-Symptomatic LMCA disease or documented MI
-Angiographic evidence of ≥50% diameter stenosis of LMCA
Exclusion criteria
-Contraindication to antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy
-LVEF<40%
IVUS Group Preintervention (56) and postintervention (77) IVUS
IVUS criteria for optimal stenting
Complete stent tovessel wall
apposition; lumen CSA90% of distal reference lumen
CSA; full lesion coverage
QCA: analyzed by 2 independent angiographers using on-line QCA system. Angiographic stenosis defined as diameter stenosis>50% @follow-up
Directional atherectomy
performed before stenting in 40 lesions.
All pts received aspirin + coumadinor aspirin + ticlopidine At least 48 hours before stenting
  IVUS No IVUS
N 77 50
MLD prior (mm)    
  1.2 (0.5) (0.5)
    P= .02
MLD after (mm)    
  4.2 (0.6) 4.0 (0.6)
    P = .003
MLD follow-up (mm)    
  2.7 (1.0) 2.7 (1.0)
    P = .976
Angiographic restenosis %  
  18.6 19.5
    P = .556

For entire cohort: MACE free survival 86.9% @ 1year & 2 years.
Survival rate 98.1% @ 1 year &97% @ 2 year
Stenting of unprotected LMCA stenosis might be associated with favourable long-term outcome in selected patients. Guidance with IVUS may optimize the immediate results & debulking before stenting seems to be effective in reducing the restenosis rate.
Large-scale RCT needed.
Agostoni 2005 (33) Assess short & midterm clinical impact of IVUS
guidance in elective percutaneo ustreatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease with drug-eluting stents
Major adverse cardiac events defined as cardiac or non-cardiac death, non-fatal MI, & target vessel revascularization Non-randomized cohort Clinical Median 433 days(range 178–780 days) Elective patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease & >50% occlusion of left main coronary artery.

IVUS n = 24 No IVUS n = 34
Vessels measured Q baseline & after procedure with quantitative coronary angiography
Unprotected left main coronary artery stented with drug-eluting stent (s) under guidance of coronary angiography or additional IVUS at the discretion of the operator.
External elastic membrane areas & lumen cross-sectional area measured with computerized planimetry.

Criteria for optimal stent placement: Complete stent-to-stent wall apposition, adequate stent expansion (>80% reference cross-sectional area), full lesion coverage.
Incidence of MACE
IVUS 8%
No IVUS 20% (P = .18) Univariate analysis:
Distal left main involvement & reference vessel diameter were the only significant predictors of MACE.
Multivariate analysis:
Distal left main disease was theonly significant predictor of MACE (Hazard ratio 7.7, 95% CI 1–62.6, P =.05).
IVUS was not associated with additional clinical benefit with respect to angiographic-assisted stent deployment

Major Limitation: Small sample Non-randomized No angiographic follow-up