Table 2.
Technique | Hippocampus (%) | SVZ (%) | Neurocognitive OAR (%) |
---|---|---|---|
CTV V95 = 98% | |||
Protons | 77.0 (71.0–80.6) | 79.2 (71.6–87.0) | 78.0 (71.3–81.1) |
IMRT | 89.7 (87.0–92.7) | 90.5 (86.5–93.3) | 90.0 (86.9–93.0) |
IMAT | 97.2 (95.9–98.4) | 98.7 (96.6–101.7) | 97.8 (96.2–99.8) |
Opposing fields | 98.0 (97.2–99.3) | 100.4 (99.4–101.3) | 99.2 (98.9–100.0) |
CTV V95 = 95% | |||
Protons | 41.9 (25.9–50.3) | 42.7 (27.4–51.5) | 42.3 (26.6–51.2) |
IMRT | 77.1 (72.5–81.1) | 77.2 (70.6–81.5) | 77.1 (71.5–81.3) |
IMAT | 87.1 (82.9–89.4) | 89.6 (84.3–94.2) | 88.3 (83.6–91.0) |
Opposing fields | 98.0 (97.2–99.3) | 100.4 (99.4–101.3) | 99.2 (98.9–100.0) |
Note: The neurocognitive OAR dose was taken as the average dose of the hippocampus and the SVZ.