Skip to main content
. 2012 May 17;14(7):882–889. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos120

Table 3.

Estimates of odds ratios between the different treatment techniques and the 2 different dose prescriptions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs)

Task efficiency
Organization
Memory
36 Gy 23.4 Gy 36 Gy 23.4 Gy 36 Gy 23.4 Gy
Protons/IMRT V95 = 98% 0.64 (0.58–0.71) 0.75 (0.70–0.80) 0.73 (0.66–0.81) 0.82 (0.76–0.88) 0.87 (0.80–0.93) 0.91 (0.87–0.95)
Protons/IMRT V95 = 95% 0.28 (0.23–0.33) 0.44 (0.38–0.49) 0.43 (0.35–0.51) 0.56 (0.49–0.65) 0.67 (0.57–0.78) 0.76 (0.68–0.86)
IMRT/IMAT V95 = 98% 0.77 (0.70–0.84) 0.84 (0.78–0.89) 0.83 (0.75–0.90) 0.88 (0.82–0.93) 0.92 (0.87–0.96) 0.94 (0.91–0.98)
IMRT/IMAT V95 = 95% 0.68 (0.61–0.74) 0.78 (0.72–0.83) 0.76 (0.68–0.84) 0.83 (0.77–0.89) 0.88 (0.82–0.94) 0.92 (0.88–0.96)

Note: An upper CI limit below 1.00 represents significantly different odds ratios between techniques in the paired Monte Carlo test.