Table 3. Phylogenetic analyses performed in this study.

Analyses	Characters (number of characters/base pairs used in phylogenetic analyses)	Taxa (number of taxa/sequences)	Method	Weight strategy inMP analyses	Figure
Morphological analyses	Adjusted characters (#112)	22 species plus 1 outgroup (#23)	MP	Equal weight	Figure 5a
	Adjusted characters (#112)	22 species plus 1 outgroup (#23)	MP	non-dental charactersup-weighted	Figure 5b
	Non-dental (#76)	22 species plus 1 outgroup (#23)	MP	Equal weight	Figure 5c
	Dental characters (#36)	22 species plus 1 outgroup (#23)	MP	Equal weight	Figure 5d
	Adjusted characters (#112)	14 species plus 1 outgroup (#15)	MP	Equal weight	Figure S1a
	Adjusted characters (#112)	14 species plus 1 outgroup (#15)	MP	non-dental charactersup-weighted	Figure S1b
	Non-dental (#76)	14 species plus 1 outgroup (#15)	MP	Equal weight	Figure S1c
	Dental characters (#36)	14 species plus 1 outgroup (#15)	MP	Equal weight	Figure S1d
Molecular analyses	12S (504 bp stem and 362 bp loop region)	13 species plus 5 outgroup (# 32)	Bayesian	N.A.	Figure 6a
	CYT B (1,140 bp)	11 species plus 4 outgroup (# 30)	Bayesian		Figure 6b
	ND2 (1,053 bp)	11 species plus 4 outgroup (# 30)	Bayesian		Figure 6c
Combined analyses	12S + CYT B +ND2 (3,059 bp)	14 species plus 5 outgroup (# 30)	Bayesian		Figure 7a
	Adjusted characters (#112) +3 genes (3,059 bp)	14 species plus 5 outgroup (# 34)	Bayesian
		22 species (8 have no genetic data)plus 5 outgroup (# 34)	Bayesian		Figure 7b
Additional analyses	Partial CYT B (539–1,140 bp)	Hylomys suillus/parvus plus 3outgroups (# 23)	Bayesian		Figure 8