Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;28(7):734–738. doi: 10.1089/aid.2011.0251

Table 3.

Concordance, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Genotyping Tools Taking as Reference the Trofile Assay

Genotypic algorithms Concordance (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
11/25 rule 70.8 59 100
Geno2phenoMotivate 66.7 53 100
Geno2pheno20clonal 79.2 76 85.7
Geno2pheno20clínicoC 73.9 75 71.4
Geno2pheno20clínicoN 68.8 90 33.3
Geno2pheno10clonal 66.7 58.8 85.7
Geno2pheno10clínicoC 69.6 37.5 100
Geno2pheno10clínicoN 50.0 50 50
PSSM 76.2 64 100
IAL criterion 95.8 94 100

Agreement between Trofile results with different genotypic algorithms; geno2pheno were evaluated using different cutoffs. Values of false-positive rate, including 5.75, (motivate), 10%, and 20%, using both clonal and clinical option, the latter applying both recommended nadir TCD4 (N) and TCD4 at collection (C).