Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 21;10(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-S1-S18

Table 4.

Performance comparison of various approaches on DIP-CYC2008

Method P R F Sn PPV Acc
MCODE 0.576 0.096 0.164 0.282 0.328 0.304
CFinder 0.396 0.257 0.312 0.612 0.297 0.437
CMC 0.283 0.505 0.363 0.523 0.526 0.525
RRW 0.541 0.365 0.436 0.378 0.557 0.459
COACH 0.418 0.529 0.467 0.545 0.481 0.512
CORE 0.16 0.662 0.258 0.569 0.567 0.568
Ours 0.537 0.699 0.607 0.583 0.578 0.581