Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 21;8(6):e1002765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002765

Table 5. The comparison of the original and the newly refined IgAN risk score.

Original Risk Score Newly Refined Risk Score
Cohort: N# R2 * C** OR*** P-value**** R2 * C** OR*** P-value****
Original GWAS Cohorts 5,631 5.0% 0.61 1.51 3.1×10−46 5.7% 0.62 1.56 4.1×10−52
Replication Cohorts 4,422 2.2% 0.58 1.29 5.4×10−17 3.2% 0.59 1.36 3.3×10−24
Asian Cohorts Combined 4,582 4.5% 0.60 1.53 3.0×10−34 5.0% 0.61 1.52 2.6×10−38
European Cohorts Combined 5,386 2.6% 0.58 1.34 3.7×10−24 3.6% 0.59 1.42 6.7×10−33
All Cohorts Combined 10,053 3.8% 0.60 1.42 6.2×10−63 4.7% 0.61 1.47 1.2×10−76

The expanded version of this table can be found in supplemental material (Table S7).

#

Number of analyzed individuals with 100% non-missing genotypes across all 7 scored loci.

*: 2: Nagelkerke R square (expressed as percentage).

**: C-statistic: area under the ROC curve.

***: Odds ratio per one standard deviation of the standardized risk score.

****: Wald's test for risk score as a quantitative predictor of disease status.