Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2012 Apr 12;106(5):579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.006

Table 1.

Taste quality responses to various amounts of stearic acid and linoleic acid.

Stearic Acid,
umoles
Sweet Sour Salty Bitter No Discernible
Taste
Other
0.0 0 0 1 7 80 11 [46]
1.1 0 2 0 7 31 60 [48]
1.3 0 5 0 5 21 69 [79]
1.5 0 5 0 12 14 69 [48]
1.7 0 0 0 31 41 29 [67]

Linoleic Acid,
umoles
Sweet Sour Salty Bitter No Discernible
Taste
Other

0.0 3 1 3 5 81 7 [71]
1.1 2 2 9 13 34 40 [47]
1.3 0 0 9 23 23 45 [45]
1.5 2 9 9 17 21 43 [49]
1.7 0 4 6 28 19 43 [42]

All taste quality responses were normalized to 100%. “Other” taste represents a response that is not perceived as sweet, sour, salty, or bitter. Subjects who responded “other” were further asked to use a word description to identify the taste quality of fatty acid taste strips. Data in parenthesis in column seven represent the percentage of “other” tasters who gave a taste quality response of fatty/oily/waxy/sunflower seed taste. Data for stearic acid is from 30 subjects, and includes one light smoker (<10 cigarettes per day). Data for linoleic acid is from the 52 non-smoking subjects.