Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 6;220(3):242–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01470.x

Table 1.

Micromineralization and packet score data and P-values in immature (a) and mature (b) bones at their 50% location.

Dorsal Plantar P-value
(a) Immature bones (n = 7)
BSE mineral content (WMGL) 135.5 (3.2) 127.1 (3.5) 0.002
Mineral heterogeneity (FWHM of BMDD) 4.8 (0.1) 5.1 (0.2) 0.01
Skewness of BMDD 1.16 (0.0) 1.05 (0.0) 0.007
Kurtosis of BMDD −0.11 (0.1) −0.36 (0.1) 0.02
Packet prevalence 46.2 (3.6)* 44.9 (2.8) ns
(b) Mature bones (n = 7)
BSE mineral content (WMGL) 137.8 (3.7) 128.9 (3.3) < 0.001
Mineral heterogeneity (FWHM of BMDD) 4.7 (0.1) 4.8 (0.1) ns
Skewness of BMDD 1.17 (0.0) 1.13 (0.0) ns
Kurtosis of BMDD −0.10 (0.0) −0.20 (0.1) ns
Packet prevalence 34.6 (2.4) * 48.3 (3.0) 0.006
*

Significantly different (P < 0.05) from other age group in comparison with the same tract (i.e. dorsal vs. dorsal comparison; or plantar vs. plantar comparison).

ns = non-significant, where all P values are > 0.2.

Packet prevalence = no. packets mm−2 of bone.

BMDD, bone mineral density distribution; BSE, backscattered electron; FWHM, full-width half-maximum; WMGL, weighted mean gray level.