Skip to main content
. 2012 May;2(3):221–230. doi: 10.1002/brb3.47

Table 4.

Fractional areas of β-amyloid and tau.

Mean (SD) fractional area tau Mean (SD) fractional area amyloid


Group MFG MTG PreCu IP MFG MTG PreCu IP
CN 0 0.0017 0 0.0043 0.73 0.52 0.40 0.45
(0) (0.0041) (0) (0.011) (1.9) (1.3) (1.1) (1.2)
ASYMAD 0.74 0.050 0.0067 0.033 2.6 1.5 0.91 1.1
(1.8) (0.087) (0.016) (0.072) (1.3) (0.18) (0.75) (1.3)
CI 0.23 0.33 0.018 0.29 4.0 3.1 2.4 2.3
(0.33) (0.29) (0.026) (0.33) (1.3) (1.3) (1.4) (1.0)

All values have been divided by a factor of 102. There are no significant differences (P≥ 0.05) in the mean area fractions of amyloid between ASYMAD and CI in the MFG, MTG, and IP.

There are no significant differences (P≥ 0.05) in the mean area fractions of tau between ASYMAD and CI in any of the l four regions.

CI has significantly more tau and amyloid (P≤ 0.05) than CN in all four regions.