Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217–231. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442154

Table 3.

Regression Models Predicting Individual Differences in Fifth-Grade Passage Comprehension

B SE β t p Value
Using December WIF as a Predictor
    Constant 26.43 0.49 54.14 < .001
    December WIF 0.10 0.02 .30 5.09 < .001
    RAN –0.56 0.20 –.15 –2.76 < .001
    Phonological processing 1.10 0.23 .30 4.77 < .001
    Oral language 0.63 0.23 .17 2.81 .006
    Nonverbal reasoning 0.53 0.21 .15 2.53 .012
Using May WIF as a Predictor
    Constant 21.17 0.42 60.25 < .001
    May WIF 0.08 0.01 .50 9.24 < .001
    RAN –0.18 0.19 –.05 –0.97 .335
    Phonological processing 0.87 0.21 .24 4.21 < .001
    Oral language 0.80 0.20 .22 3.97 < .001
    Nonverbal reasoning 0.46 0.19 .13 2.47 .014

Note: WIF = Word Identification Fluency; RAN = rapid automatized naming.