Table 1.
A comparison of error rates, information content and running times (per lane) for different base callers (note that Bustard's running time is underestimated since it does not account for the parameter estimation step)
Decoding strategy | Error rate | IC(in mil) | Running times (min) |
---|---|---|---|
Rolexa | 0.0171 | 514.3 | 720 |
Bustard | 0.0154 | 512.7 | 40 |
Ibis | 0.0147 | 526.9 | 480 |
NaiveBayescall | 0.0139 | 528.9 | 1500 |
OnlineCall | 0.0137 | 529.3 | 30 |