Skip to main content
. 2012 May 7;28(13):1677–1683. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts256

Table 1.

A comparison of error rates, information content and running times (per lane) for different base callers (note that Bustard's running time is underestimated since it does not account for the parameter estimation step)

Decoding strategy Error rate IC(in mil) Running times (min)
Rolexa 0.0171 514.3 720
Bustard 0.0154 512.7 40
Ibis 0.0147 526.9 480
NaiveBayescall 0.0139 528.9 1500
OnlineCall 0.0137 529.3 30