Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 May;57(5):863–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02245.x

Table 3.

APU Rates and Relative Rates, by Care Setting

Care Setting Number
of Patients
with
APUs
Person-
Days at
Risk
APU Rate
per 100
Person-Days
(95% CI)
Relative Rate
(95% CI),
Model 1
(n=658)
Relative Rate
(95% CI),
Model 2
(n=619)
Relative Rate
(95% CI),
Model 3
(n=614)
Relative Rate
(95% CI),
Model 4
(n=614)
Acute hospital 96 1984 4.8 (4.0–5.9) 8.6 (5.6–13.3) 6.2 (4.0–9.5) 4.1 (2.5–6.7) 2.2 (1.3–3.7)
Rehabilitation 18 1457 1.2 (0.8–2.0) 2.2 (1.4–3.6) 2.2 (1.3–3.4) 1.9 (1.1–3.1) 1.4 (0.8–2.3)
Nursing home 81 5405.5 1.5 (1.2–1.9) 2.7 (1.7–4.1) 2.1 (1.4–3.3) 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 1.3 (0.8–2.1)
Home 6 1072 0.6 (0.2–1.2) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Re-admission to acute hospital 7 236.5 3.0 (1.3–6.1) 5.3 (3.0–9.3) 4.0 (2.2–7.1) 2.2 (1.1–4.2) 2.2 (1.1–4.2)

Notes: APU=acquired pressure ulcer

Model 1: Unadjusted

Model 2: Adjusted for baseline covariates (age, sex, Mini-Mental State Exam score, pre-admission residence, incontinence, history of chronic cognitive deficit, nutritional risk, body mass index, activity level, presence of pre-existing pressure ulcers, Rand Sickness at Admission score, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, albumin level, arterial insufficiency, and admission hospital)

Model 3: Adjusted for baseline covariates and time-dependent covariates (acute mental status, activity level, and incontinence)

Model 4: Adjusted for baseline covariates, time-dependent covariates, and days since initial hospital admission