Table 15: Outcome Measures Used in the 4 Studies Included in the Medical Advisory Secretariat’s Systematic Review.
Study, Year | Level of Evidence | Pain | Functionality | Quality of Life |
---|---|---|---|---|
North et al. (81) 2005 | 2 | % crossover to alternate treatment % success defined as at least 50% pain relief on VAS* and satisfaction with treatment |
Ability to perform daily activities | Not assessed |
Kemler et al., (63) 2004 | 2 | VAS: 0 cm = no pain; 10 cm = very severe pain. McGill Pain Questionnaire Global Perceived effect (1, worse ever; 2, much worse; 3, worse; 4, not improved and not worse; 5, improved; 6, much improved, 7, best ever. |
Test of Jebsen et al.* Kemler foot test Goniometry: Range of motion of both ankles or both wrists and all fingers Jamar dynamometer grip strength Hand held myometer strength of foot dorsi and plantar flexion |
Nottingham Health Profile Euroquol-5D Sickness Impact Profile-Short Version The Self-Rating Depression Scale |
Spincemaille et al., (42) 2004 | 3a | VAS: 0 cm = no pain; 10 cm = worse pain ever. McGill Pain Questionnaire |
ROLAND disability score | Sickness Impact Profile-68 Euroquol-5D |
Harke et al., (83) 2002 | 3a | VAS: 0 points = no pain; 10 points = unbearable pain | Pain disability index: 0, no disability; 10, total disability | Not assessed |
VAS indicates visual analogue scale of pain.