Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar 1;5(4):1–78.

Table 15: Outcome Measures Used in the 4 Studies Included in the Medical Advisory Secretariat’s Systematic Review.

Study, Year Level of Evidence Pain Functionality Quality of Life
North et al. (81) 2005 2 % crossover to alternate treatment

% success defined as at least 50% pain relief on VAS* and satisfaction with treatment
Ability to perform daily activities Not assessed
Kemler et al., (63) 2004 2 VAS: 0 cm = no pain; 10 cm = very severe pain.

McGill Pain Questionnaire

Global Perceived effect (1, worse ever; 2, much worse; 3, worse; 4, not improved and not worse; 5, improved; 6, much improved, 7, best ever.
Test of Jebsen et al.* Kemler foot test

Goniometry: Range of motion of both ankles or both wrists and all fingers

Jamar dynamometer grip strength

Hand held myometer strength of foot dorsi and plantar flexion
Nottingham Health Profile

Euroquol-5D

Sickness Impact Profile-Short Version

The Self-Rating Depression Scale
Spincemaille et al., (42) 2004 3a VAS: 0 cm = no pain; 10 cm = worse pain ever.

McGill Pain Questionnaire
ROLAND disability score Sickness Impact Profile-68 Euroquol-5D
Harke et al., (83) 2002 3a VAS: 0 points = no pain; 10 points = unbearable pain Pain disability index: 0, no disability; 10, total disability Not assessed
*

VAS indicates visual analogue scale of pain.