Table 2: Summary of Study Characteristics for Prostate Cancer (N=21 Studies).
Author [Year] | Study Location | Study Design | Length of Follow-up* | Cases/Referent* (no.) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carlsson [2010] | Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden | Prospective cohort± | 19/30 months | 1253/485 |
Lo [2010] | Prince of Whales Hospital, Hong Kong | Prospective C-C±Cases,Ref | 6/42 months | 20/20 |
D’Alonzo [2009] | Duke University Medical Center, USA | Retrospective, database | - | 256/280 |
Drouin [2009] | Paris, France | Retrospective, database | - | 71/85/83 |
Ficarra [2009a] | Padua, Italy | Prospective cohort± | ≥12 months | 103/105 |
Hakimi [2009] | New York, USA | Retrospective, database¥ | 12 months | 75/75§ |
Laurila [2009] | UWHC, USA | Retrospective MRR±Ref | - | 88/84 |
Ou [2009] | Taichung, Taiwan | C-C (historical)±Cases,Ref | Up to 12 months | 30/30 |
Polcari [2009] | Illinois, USA | Retrospective MRR± | - | 60/64 |
Rocco [2009] | Milan, Italy | Prospective C-C | Up to 12 months | 120/240 |
White [2009] | Michigan, USA | Retrospective MRR±Cases,¥ | - | 50/50 |
Yates [2009] | Providence, USA | C-C (historical) | 62/61 | |
Zorn [2009] | Chicago, USA | Retrospective, database±Cases | - | 296/471 |
Trabulsi [2008] | Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, USA | Prospective C-C±,† | - | 50/190§ |
Wood [2007] | Michigan, USA | Prospective cohort± | 2 and 6 weeks‡ | 117/89 |
Ball [2006] | Virginia, USA | Prospective C-C† | Up to 6 months | 82/124/135 |
Hohwu [2009] | Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Denmark | Retrospective MRR± | - | 127/147 |
Ploussard [2009] | Creteil, France | Prospective cohort | - | 83/205§ |
Weizer [2010] | Michigan, USA | Prospective C-C | - | 515/118 |
O’Malley [2006] | University of Melbourne, Australia | Prospective C-C± | - | 102/102 |
Srinualnad [2008] | Mahidol University, Bangkok | Prospective cohort | Up to 1 month | 34/34§ |
Sample sizes according to: robotic/retropubic prostatectomy or robotic/laparoscopic/retropubic prostatectomy.
Robotic/laparoscopic.
Consecutive patients.
Individually-matched study design.
Data were collected Prospectively, before and after the introduction of a robotics program.
Follow-up refers to health-related quality of life questionnaire [not discussed here].
Note: C-C, case-case comparison; Ref, referent group; UWHC, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics; MRR, medical record review.