Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 8;249(3):805–817. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0325-y

Table 1.

Comparison of the morphological parameters of green and white sectors of variegated leaves used in this study (1): variegation pattern and leaf thickness

Species (genus) Variegation pattern Leaf thickness (μm)
Organ level Tissue level Green White W/G ratio t-Test
t P
Schefflera C P 428 ± 14 424 ± 18 0.99 0.18 0.87
Solenostemon C P+S 215 ± 9 233 ± 5 1.08 0.17 0.17
Impatiens C P+S 380 ±20 382 ± 14 1.01 −0.10 0.92
Hosta C P+S 232 ± 8 217 ± 10 0.94 1.22 0.29
Ipomea R P 212 ± 4 206 ± 5 0.97 0.96 0.39
Felicia R P+S 382 ± 23 429 ± 11 1.12 −1.80 0.15
Hedera R/M P, S, P+S 227 ± 3 202 ± 5 0.89 4.32 0.01
Epipremnum R P, S, P+S 305 ± 5 257 ± 23 0.84 2.08 0.11
Abutilon M (w/o P, S) 92 ± 3 67 ± 2 0.73 6.98 <0.01
Fragaria M P+S 157 ± 4 141 ± 3 0.90 3.28 0.03
Pelargonium M P, S, P+S 194 ± 7 149 ± 8 0.77 4.02 0.02
Dracaena M P+S 236 ± 4 201 ± 6 0.85 4.99 <0.01

For leaf thickness in green and white sectors, each datum represents an average ± standard error (n = 3). The results of Student’s t-tests are also shown.

W/G ratio, ratio of the average values for green and white sectors; C central type, R random type, M marginal type, P pallisade tissue, S spongy tissue