Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2012 Jul;33(4):521–533. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9dfc

Table 3.

Cochlear implant type and parameters for each participant.

Participant Cochlear Implant Processor # Active Channels Strategy Rate per Channel Total Stim Rate
P1 Nucleus Contour Advance Freedom 21 ACE 1800 14400
P2 Nucleus Contour Advance Freedom 22 ACE 1800 14400
P3 Nucleus 512 810 22 ACE 1800 14400
P4 Advanced Bionics 90K/Hifocus 1j Harmony 8 HiRes-S 2900 23300
P5 Med-El Sonata100 OPUS 2 10 FSP 2256 22560
P6 Nucleus 512 810 22 ACE 500 4000
P7 Nucleus 512 810 20 ACE 900 7200
P8 Nucleus 512 810 21 ACE 900 7200
P9 Nucleus 512 810 20 ACE 900 7200
P10 Nucleus 512 810 19 ACE 900 7200

Note: # = number; ACE = advanced combined encoder; HiRes-S = high resolution with sequential stimulation; FSP = fine structure processing; Stim = stimulation