Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Jul 1;60(3):307–313. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182511e42

Table 3B.

B. At delivery

Group Mean (SE) log10 HIV load at
baselinea
Mean (SE) log10 HIV load at
delivery
Crude mean
difference (95% CI)
Adjusted mean
difference (95% CI)b
p
Placebo Albendazole Placebo Albendazole
All women 4.16 (0.09) 4.05 (0.08) 4.10 (0.09) 3.83 (0.08) −0.27 (−0.51, −0.03) −0.11 (−0.28, 0.07) 0.23
Hookworm infected 4.27 (0.13) 4.12 (0.14) 4.10 (0.14) 3.87 (0.14) −0.24 (−0.63, 0.16) −0.00 (−0.25, 0.25) 0.43c
Hookworm uninfected 4.09 (0.12) 4.03 (0.10) 4.10 (0.12) 3.81 (0.10) −0.29 (−0.60, 0.03) −0.17 (−0.42, 0.07)

Placebo Praziquantel Placebo Praziquantel

All women 4.04 (0.08) 4.05 (0.09) 3.94 (0.08) 3.99 (0.09) 0.05 (−0.20, 0.29) 0.04 (−0.13, 0.21) 0.64
S. mansoni infected 3.86 (0.17) 4.12 (0.21) 3.69 (0.20) 4.04 (0.24) 0.35 (−0.27, 0.97) 0.10 (−0.22, 0.42) 0.50c
S. mansoni uninfected 4.09 (0.09) 4.03 (0.10) 4.00 (0.09) 3.98 (0.10) 0.02 (−0.25, 0.29) 0.01 (−0.19, 0.21)
a

For those with viral load measured at delivery

b

For effect of albendazole treatment, results were adjusted for baseline viral load and baseline malaria parasitaemia; for effect of praziquantel treatment, results were adjusted for baseline viral load

c

Interaction p-value

SE=standard error; CI=confidence interval