Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Violence. 2012 Feb 20;2(2):179–193. doi: 10.1037/a0027185

Table 1.

Bivariate Correlations, Means, and Standard Deviations of Study Variables (N = 220)

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Child Sexual Abuse --
2. Child Physical Abuse .18** --
3. Expectancy Effect .12 −.01 --
4. Pharmacological Effect .05 .03 −.04 --
5. Dose Effect .15* .13 −.01 .01 --
6. Kim's Sexual Arousal .16* .10 −.04 .17* .19** --
7. Sexual Entitlement .20** .08 −.01 .22** .04 .30** --
8. Condom Use Resistance .20** .11 −.04 .18** −.03 .49** .70** --
9. Sexual Aggression Intentions .15 .16* −.08 .11 .01 .55** .41** .68** --

Mean .20 .60 NA NA NA 2.89 1.75 2.11 3.34
Standard Deviation .40 .49 1.27 1.25 1.30 1.65
Range 0 – 1 0 – 1 1 – 7 1 – 7 1 – 6.63 1 – 7

Note 1.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

Note 2. “Expectancy effect” refers to the contrast comparing control and placebo conditions. “Pharmacological effect” refers to the contrast comparing participants who consumed alcohol (low and high doses) with those who did not (controls and placebos). “Dose effect” refers to the contrast comparing the high dose and low dose conditions.