Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Violence. 2012 Feb 20;2(2):179–193. doi: 10.1037/a0027185

Table 2.

Path Weights (Standardized and Unstandardized) with Standard Errors (N = 220)

Unstandardized S.E. Z-Score Standardized
Kim's Sexual Arousal ON
Child Sexual Abuse 0.42 0.21 2.02* 0.13
Expectancy Effect −0.16 0.23 −0.72 −0.05
Pharmacological Effect 0.39 0.17 2.39* 0.16
Alcohol Dose Effect 0.59 0.24 2.45* 0.16
Sexual Entitlement ON
Child Physical Abuse 0.06 0.16 0.40 0.03
Child Sexual Abuse 0.58 0.21 2.80** 0.19
Expectancy Effect −0.06 0.22 −0.26 −0.02
Pharmacological Effect 0.51 0.16 3.15** 0.20
Alcohol Dose Effect 0.03 0.24 0.14 0.01
Condom Use Resistance ON
Kim's Sexual Arousal 0.31 0.05 6.56*** 0.31
Sexual Entitlement 0.64 0.05 13.15*** 0.61
Sexual Aggress Intentions ON
Child Sexual Abuse 0 0.2 −0.01 0
Kim's Sexual Arousal 0.37 0.07 5.35*** 0.29
Condom Use Resistance 0.69 0.07 10.09*** 0.54
Child Physical Abuse WITH
Child Sexual Abuse 0.04 0.01 2.64** 0.18
Kim's Sexual Arousal WITH
Sexual Entitlement 0.36 0.1 3.57*** 0.23

Note 1.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

Note 2. “Expectancy effect” refers to the contrast comparing control and placebo conditions. “Pharmacological effect” refers to the contrast comparing participants who consumed alcohol (low and high doses) with those who did not (controls and placebos). “Alcohol dose effect” refers to the contrast comparing the high dose and low dose conditions.