Table 1.
Approach | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Natural Mutants | ||
Assays using natural erythrocyte mutants | Polymorphisms selected by nature (physiologically relevant) Viable erythrocytes naturally obtained |
Confounding polymorphisms also present Difficult to control experiments with cells from different donors Inability to complement the mutation |
Functional genomics of natural mutants |
Using natural selection to identify novel candidate resistance/susceptibility loci |
Weak signals due to (weak) linkage disequilibrium To date, GWAS has required further deep sequencing to uncover signals |
Biochemical Approaches | ||
Pull-down | Detects physiologically interacting proteins, ex vivo or in vitro, with or without cross-linkers | Possible that weak interactions will not be detected by pull-down |
Gel-overlay, Erythrocyte binding assays (EBAs) with enzyme treated erythrocytes | Can use both antibody mediated detection or radioactive methods | Protein abundance and stability can effect the sensitivity Requires stable protein interactions |
Invasion assays with enzyme treated erythrocytes | Determine the effect of removing sets of receptors in the same genetic background on parasite invasion | Non-specific removal of receptors. Removes groups of both known and unknown receptors. |
Antibody mediated inhibition | Specific inhibition of a receptor by blocking access to the parasite ligands Can determine the effect of blocking a given receptor in the same genetic background High throughput |
Antibody dependent (not all antibodies are inhibitory) Agglutination Off target effects of antibodies (can impact both invasion and membrane rigidity, for example) |
Avexis | Pentamerizing the bait or prey increases detection of transient interactions | Limited by what can be expressed (size, glycosylation, number of transmembrane domains) False positives |
Chemical genetic Approaches | ||
Chemical inhibition | Potent inhibition can be achieved Temporal inhibition can be achieved Depending on the inhibitor, inhibition can be reversed |
Off-target effects Specificity of inhibition can be dependent on concentration Host versus parasite specificity can be a narrow window, and difficult to achieve |
Immunodepletion of cytoplasmic proteins | The alternative to transgenic modification with the same result – specific depletion of a given protein | Limited to cytoplasmic proteins |
Transgenic Approaches | ||
shRNA Knock-down | Stable and either inducible or constant Amenable to forward genetic screens Can study the effect of the absence (or decrease) of a given protein in the erythrocyte |
Level of knock-down varies depending on the gene Knock-down (rather than knock-out) can be insufficient to yield a phenotype Erythrocyte viability can be effected depending on when the knock-down has an effect May be necessary to induce knock-down later in erythropoiesis to avoid developmental effects |
Ectopic expression | Inducible expression, varying level of expression, can be achieved with specific vectors and promoters | Matching physiologic levels of expression with appropriate promoters |
Allelic replacement | Complementation is possible (ectopically expressing a protein in a null background) | Must codon optimize the transgenically expressed allele to avoid shRNA mediated KD of replacement as well as endogenous Matching levels of expression with appropriate promoters |
GWAS, genome-wide association study; shRNA, small hairpin RNA; KD, knock down; AVEXIS, avidity-based extracellular interaction screen.