Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):668–678. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0ddf

Table 7.

Summary for the therapies analyzed including the association between bundle use and their administration, the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence supporting their use in septic shock based on the GRADE system,a and whether randomized controlled trials (RCT) are under way or planned to determine the effectiveness of these therapies in septic shock

Therapy Consistent Association
Between Bundle Use
and Administration
of Therapy
SSC 2008 Guidelines Grade
On-going or
Planned RCTb
Recommendation Quality of
Evidence
Antibiotics
 Rapid antibiotics Yes Strong Moderate None
 Appropriate
  antibiotics
Yes Strong Moderate None
Fluids for CVP
  8–12 mm Hg
No Strong Low ProCESS, ARISE,
ProMISE
Vasopressors for MAP
  ≥65 mm Hg
No Strong Low ProCESS, ARISE,
ProMISE
Inotropes for Scvo2
  ≥70%
No Weak Low ProCESS, ARISE,
ProMISE
PRBC for ScvO2
  ≥70%
No Weak Low ProCESS, ARISE,
ProMISE
Corticosteroids No Weak Low HYPRESS,
APROCCHS
rhAPC No Weak Moderate PROWESS-SHOCK,
APROCHHS

CVP, central venous pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PRBC, packed red blood cells; rhAPC, recombinant human activated protein C.

a

The GRADE system as employed in the SSC guidelines (31);

b

see Table 8 for details regarding these trials.