Table 3.
K103N and Y181C detected by ASPCR versus UDPS
| ASPCR
|
UDPS
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | %K103N | %Y181C | %K103N | %Y181C |
| 7 | bd | 0.9% | bd | bd |
| 9 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 11 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 17 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 19 | bd | 1.0% | bd | bd |
| 22 | 48.9% | 3.1% | 49.90% | 0.49% |
| 24 | 18.7% | bd | 10.62% | bd |
| 2 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 3 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 4 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 8 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 12 | 106.0% | bd | 99.83% | bd |
| 14 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 15 | 63.5% | bd | 99.71% | bd |
| 18 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 20 | bd | bd | 0.18% | 0.36% |
| 28 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 29 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 30 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
| 32 | bd | bd | bd | bd |
bd = below detection