. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Feb 4;222(2):343–351. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2649-5

Table 1.

Results of General Linear Model Analyses Examining Anhedonia and Deprivation Status as Predictors of Happiness Interference Scores

Predictors	Unadjusted^a			Adjusted^b
Predictors	F(1, 72)	p	η_p²	F(1, 71)	p	η_p²
Model with SHAPS
SHAPS	2.80	.10	.04	2.60	.11	.04
Deprivation	0.82	.89	<.01	0.82	.89	<.01
SHAPS × Deprivation	4.45	.04	.06	4.50	.04	.06
Model with TPI-R
TPI-R	11.89	.0009	.14	12.07	.0009	.15
Deprivation	0.82	.89	<.01	0.82	.89	<.01
TPI-R × Deprivation	2.75	.10	.04	2.76	.10	.04

Note. N = 75.

Included primary predictors in model only;

Adjusted for CESD and CESD Deprivation interaction term.

Deprivation (Deprived vs. Nondeprived); SHAPS = Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale continuous score; TPI-R = Tripartite Pleasure Inventory-Responsiveness subscale continuous score; CESD = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; Happiness Interference Scores = Reaction Time (RT) on Happiness trials – RT on Neutral Trials.