. 2012 Feb 24;11:56. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-56

Table 3.

Summary statistics from model estimates.

Site	Model	Indoor		Outdoor

	parameters	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
		0.1231	0.0082	0.0085	17.4800

Mongola	${\hat{β}}_{0}$	(0.1108- 0.1364)	(0.0012- 0.0280)	(0.0060- 0.0116)	(0.0572 - 130.9)

	${\hat{β}}_{1}$	-	1.702	-	-0.2934

			(1.3470- 2.0770)		(-1.1760- 0.5901)

	DIC	717.318	680.630	206.033	199.661

	R²	0.124	0.172	-0.0175	-0.00197

Arena Blanca	${\hat{β}}_{0}$	0.3624	0.0104	0.1034	0.2873

		(0.3239- 0.4030)	(0.0020-0.0337)	(0.0878- 0.1204)	(0.0969-0.6085)

	${\hat{β}}_{1}$	-	1.9930	-	0.7673

			(1.6250- 2.3570)		(0.5485 - 1.013)

	DIC	722.166	665.462	352.945	355.456

	R²	0.258	0.342	0.0842	0.107

Riaba	${\hat{β}}_{0}$	0.127	0.7376	0.0688	0.0005

		(0.0954- 0.1621)	(0.1742- 1.9140)	(0.0519- 0.0890)	(1.808E-7- 0.0039)

	${\hat{β}}_{1}$	-	0.3793	-	3.191

			(-0.0727- 0.8747)		(1.8810 - 4.8940)

	DIC	216.482	215.631	203.796	215.631

	R²	0.00136	0.0123	0.0815	0.116

For each model and parameter the posterior mean is given with 95% credible intervals (in parenthesis). Model 1 indicates proportionality (linear) and model 2 density dependence (non-linear) between light trap collections and human landing collections. A smaller Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) indicates a better fit when comparing models (further details in text)