Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Mar 10;22(5):737–742. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9746-3

Table 1.

Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relation to various sources of genital powder exposure overall and among women with borderline and invasive tumors

Controls Borderline tumors
Invasive tumors
All tumors
(n = 1,313)a (n = 217)a ORb 95% CI (n = 595)a ORb 95% CI (n = 812)a ORb 95% CI
Used powder after bathing
 No 1,161 184 1.00 Ref. 515 1.00 Ref. 699 1.00 Ref.
 Yes 151 33 1.55 1.02–2.37 79 1.17 0.87–1.58 112 1.27 0.97–1.66
Used powder on sanitary napkins
 No 1,197 201 1.00 Ref. 552 1.00 Ref. 753 1.00 Ref.
 Yes 109 16 1.03 0.58–1.84 39 0.75 0.51–1.12 55 0.82 0.58–1.16
Used powder on diaphragmc
 No 321 44 1.00 Ref. 116 1.00 Ref. 160 1.00 Ref.
 Yes 121 9 0.60 0.27–1.33 37 0.77 0.49–1.21 46 0.72 0.48–1.10
Used vaginal deodorant spray
 No 1,185 194 1.00 Ref. 532 1.00 Ref. 726 1.00 Ref.
 Yes 125 23 1.20 0.74–1.95 61 1.14 0.81–1.59 84 1.15 0.85–1.56
a

Numbers in column may not sum to total due to missing values

b

Adjusted for age, calendar year of diagnosis/reference date, county of residence, number of full-term births, and duration of hormonal contraception

c

Restricted to diaphragm users