Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 27;7(6):e39278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039278

Table 4. Association results of rs1063192 and rs7916697 in different models.

SNPs rs1063192 (CDKN2B) rs7916697 (ATOH7)
Phenotype POAG (n = 272) Controls (n = 165) POAG (n = 271∧) Controls (n = 165)
Allelic Analysis
Alleles (%) T* 523 (96.1%) 299 (90.6%) A* 410 (76%) 223 (68%)
C 21 (3.9%) 31 (9.4%) G 132 (24%) 107 (32%)
HWE P 0.51 0.68 0.20 0.40
P1 OR2 (95% CI) P1 OR2 (95% CI)
Allelic P Values 0.0008 0.39 (0.22−0.69) 0.0096 0.67 (0.50−0.91)
Genotypic and Model Based Analysis
Genotypes (%) TT 251 (92%) 135 (82%) AA 159 (59%) 73 (44%)
TC 21 (8%) 29 (18%) AG 92 (34%) 77 (47%)
CC 0 (0%) 1 (1%) GG 20 (7%) 15 (9%)
P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI)
Additive (Trend) 0.0007 0.0106
Dominant 0.00096 0.38 (0.21−0.68) 0.0034 0.56 (0.38−0.83)
Recessive 0.6771 n/a3 0.9901 0.80 (0.40−1.60)

One sample did not amplify when this marker was tested.

*

risk allele, odds ratios are calculated for the minor (protective) allele and genotypes.

1

Chi-Squared P-value. The Bonferroni corrected significance level was 0.0021 ( = 0.05/24, for 18 allelic tests for individual SNPs and 3 model specific tests for each of 2 SNPs).

2

Odds ratio.

3

no individuals were homozygous for the risk allele.