TABLE 7.
Effective scatterer diameters (d) for glass beads in Sphere A and Sphere B from backscatter coefficients measured by the different clinical systems. Also shown are mean square errors (MSE) for each system, with respect to the Faran’s theory model, assuming the estimated effective scatterer diameter. Dashed lines are assigned when no convergence was obtained in the minimization algorithm within the diameter search range.
System | Sphere A | Sphere B | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
d (μm) | MSE (10−3) | d (μm) | MSE (10−3) | |
Low-frequency range (4.9–6MHz) | ||||
From ηFaran† | 35.2 | 0.18 | 85.9 | 0.13 |
5.0MHz | --- | --- | 74.8 | 1.43 |
7.5MHz | 48.6 | 1.77 | 79.8 | 0.63 |
10MHz | --- | --- | 71.5 | 0.42 |
Siemens 9L4 | 49.7 | 1.87 | 88.3 | 0.38 |
Siemens 18L6 | 27.8 | 0.37 | 79.1 | 1.24 |
Ultrasonix L9-4 | 53.6 | 2.20 | 83.6 | 1.65 |
Ultrasonix L14-5 | --- | --- | 90.3 | 0.59 |
Zonare L8-3 | --- | --- | 65.8 | 4.49 |
Zonare L14-5 | --- | --- | ||
High-frequency range (8–12MHz) | ||||
From ηFaran† | 34.7 | 0.94 | 85.2 | 0.95 |
10MHz | 35.9 | 0.59 | 76.7 | 2.99 |
Siemens 18L6 | 34.4 | 1.17 | 77.9 | 2.52 |
VisualSonics MS200 | 36.0 | 1.07 | 76.6 | 3.30 |
Effective scatterer size was estimated using ηFaran based on glass-bead distributions (Fig. 2) and concentrations.