Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrason Imaging. 2011 Oct;33(4):233–250. doi: 10.1177/016173461103300403

TABLE 7.

Effective scatterer diameters (d) for glass beads in Sphere A and Sphere B from backscatter coefficients measured by the different clinical systems. Also shown are mean square errors (MSE) for each system, with respect to the Faran’s theory model, assuming the estimated effective scatterer diameter. Dashed lines are assigned when no convergence was obtained in the minimization algorithm within the diameter search range.

System Sphere A Sphere B
d (μm) MSE (10−3) d (μm) MSE (10−3)
Low-frequency range (4.9–6MHz)
From ηFaran 35.2 0.18 85.9 0.13
5.0MHz --- --- 74.8 1.43
7.5MHz 48.6 1.77 79.8 0.63
10MHz --- --- 71.5 0.42
Siemens 9L4 49.7 1.87 88.3 0.38
Siemens 18L6 27.8 0.37 79.1 1.24
Ultrasonix L9-4 53.6 2.20 83.6 1.65
Ultrasonix L14-5 --- --- 90.3 0.59
Zonare L8-3 --- --- 65.8 4.49
Zonare L14-5 --- ---
High-frequency range (8–12MHz)
From ηFaran 34.7 0.94 85.2 0.95
10MHz 35.9 0.59 76.7 2.99
Siemens 18L6 34.4 1.17 77.9 2.52
VisualSonics MS200 36.0 1.07 76.6 3.30

Effective scatterer size was estimated using ηFaran based on glass-bead distributions (Fig. 2) and concentrations.