Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;2012:1007.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Symptom severity

Systematic review
377 people
Data from 1 RCT
<50% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive subscore short term
with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day, mean dose 13.1 mg/day)
with risperidone (2–6 mg/day, mean dose 4.7 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

RR 1.02
95% CI 0.96 to 1.07
Not significant

Systematic review
661 people
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS positive subscore short term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference +0.48
95% CI –0.57 to +1.53
Not significant

Systematic review
231 people
3 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS positive subscore medium term
with olanzapine (7.5–40 mg/day)
with risperidone (1.5–16 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –1.58
95% CI –3.20 to +0.03
Not significant

Systematic review
810 people
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS positive subscore long term
with olanzapine (2.5–20 mg/day)
with risperidone (0.5–12 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –0.68
95% CI –1.40 to +0.04
Not significant

Systematic review
661 people
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS negative subscore short term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –0.19
95% CI –1.22 to +0.85
Not significant

Systematic review
231 people
3 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS negative subscore medium term
with olanzapine (7.5–40 mg/day)
with risperidone (1.5–16 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference 0.00
95% CI –1.59 to +1.58
Not significant

Systematic review
810 people
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in average endpoint PANSS negative subscore long term
with olanzapine (2.5–20 mg/day)
with risperidone (0.5–12 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –0.81
95% CI –1.54 to –0.07
Effect size not calculated olanzapine

Systematic review
308 people
Data from 1 RCT
Mean difference in average endpoint Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total subscore long term
with olanzapine (10–20 mg/day, mean dose 17.2 mg/day)
with risperidone (4–12 mg/day, mean dose 7.2 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –1.40
95% CI –2.43 to –0.37
Effect size not calculated olanzapine

Systematic review
80 people
Data from 1 RCT
<0.5 SD improvement in global neurocognitive score medium term
with olanzapine (10–40 mg/day, mean dose 30.4 mg/day)
with risperidone (4–16 mg/day, mean dose 11.6 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

RR 0.77
95% CI 0.52 to 1.14
Not significant

Systematic review
52 people
Data from 1 RCT
Mean difference in average endpoint global neurocognitive score medium term
with olanzapine (10–40 mg/day)
with risperidone (4–16 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –0.04
95% CI –0.39 to +0.31
Not significant

Systematic review
163 people
Data from 1 RCT
Mean difference in average endpoint neurocognitive composite score long term
with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day)
with risperidone (2–10 mg/day)
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference –0.01
95% CI –0.13 to +0.11
Not significant

Systematic review
612 people
3 RCTs in this analysis
No clinically important response on Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) score
200/307 (65%) with olanzapine
208/305 (68%) with risperidone

RR 1.07
95% CI 0.90 to 1.27
Not significant

Systematic review
394 people
2 RCTs in this analysis
Mean average CGI score long term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

WMD +0.08
95% CI –0.15 to +0.32
Not significant

Systematic review
339 people
Data from 1 RCT
No response
70/172 (41%) with olanzapine
63/167 (38%) with risperidone

RR 0.93
95% CI 0.71 to 1.21
Not significant

Systematic review
339 people
Data from 1 RCT
No response
84/172 (49%) with olanzapine
95/167 (57%) with risperidone

RR 1.16
95% CI 0.95 to 1.43
Not significant

Systematic review
339 people
Data from 1 RCT
No response
111/172 (65%) with olanzapine
123/167 (74%) with risperidone

RR 1.14
95% CI 0.99 to 1.30
Not significant

Systematic review
339 people
Data from 1 RCT
No response
136/172 (79%) with olanzapine
147/167 (88%) with risperidone

RR 1.11
95% CI 1.01 to 1.22
Small effect size olanzapine

Systematic review
80 people
Data from 1 RCT
Mean total PANSS score short term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

WMD +0.70
95% CI –7.01 to +8.41
Not significant

Systematic review
80 people
Data from 1 RCT
Mean total PANSS score medium term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

WMD +4.50
95% CI –4.70 to +13.70
Not significant

Systematic review
435 people
3 RCTs in this analysis
Mean total PANSS score long term
with olanzapine
with risperidone
Absolute results not reported

WMD 5.80
95% CI 0.30 to 11.31
Effect size not calculated olanzapine