Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;2012:1007.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Symptom severity

Systematic review
3663 people
15 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in Hedges-Olkin score for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive improvement
with risperidone
with first-generation antipsychotic drugs
Absolute results not reported

Effect size 0.16
95% CI 0.09 to 0.24
P <0.001
Effect size not calculated risperidone

Systematic review
3663 people
15 RCTs in this analysis
Mean difference in Hedges-Olkin score for PANSS negative improvement
with risperidone
with first-generation antipsychotic drugs
Absolute results not reported

Effect size 0.20
95% CI 0.13 to 0.28
P <0.001
Effect size not calculated risperidone

Systematic review
2368 people
9 RCTs in this analysis
No clinically important improvement 12 weeks
789/1809 (44%) with risperidone
292/559 (52%) with first-generation antipsychotic drugs

RR 0.85
95% CI 0.77 to 0.93
Small effect size risperidone

Systematic review
859 people
2 RCTs in this analysis
No clinically important improvement 26 weeks
191/442 (43%) with risperidone
246/417 (59%) with first-generation antipsychotic drugs

RR 0.73
95% CI 0.65 to 0.83
Small effect size risperidone

Systematic review
3286 people
28 RCTs in this analysis
Hedges' adjusted g effect size for positive symptoms (PANSS)
with risperidone
with first-generation antipsychotic drugs
Absolute results not reported

Effect size –0.13
95% CI –0.20 to –0.05
Effect size not calculated risperidone

Systematic review
3455 people
30 RCTs in this analysis
Hedges' adjusted g effect size for negative symptoms (PANSS)
with risperidone
with first-generation antipsychotic drugs
Absolute results not reported

Effect size –0.13
95% CI –0.21 to –0.06
Effect size not calculated risperidone

RCT
99 people Response to treatment 8 weeks
with risperidone
with haloperidol
Absolute results reported graphically

Reported as non-significant
Not significant