Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
Adverse effects | |||||
Systematic review |
462 people 2 RCTs in this analysis |
At least 1 adverse effect
with amisulpride (100–1000 mg/day) with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day) Absolute results not reported |
RR 1.03 95% CI 0.87 to 1.21 |
Not significant | |
Systematic review |
587 people 2 RCTs in this analysis |
Extrapyramidal symptoms
with amisulpride (100–1000 mg/day) with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day) Absolute results not reported |
Reported as not significant P value not reported |
Not significant | |
Systematic review |
672 people 3 RCTs in this analysis |
Number of people with weight gain
with amisulpride (100–1000 mg/day) with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day) Absolute results not reported |
RR 0.55 95% CI 0.40 to 0.75 |
Small effect size | amisulpride |
Systematic review |
672 people 3 RCTs in this analysis |
Weight change from baseline (kg)
with amisulpride (100–1000 mg/day) with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day) Absolute results not reported |
Difference –2.11 kg 95% CI –2.94 kg to –1.29 kg |
Effect size not calculated | amisulpride |
Systematic review |
303 people 2 RCTs in this analysis |
Mean difference in change from baseline in QTc (ms)
with amisulpride (100–1000 mg/day) with olanzapine (5–20 mg/day) Absolute results not reported |
Mean difference +5.25 ms 95% CI –0.57 ms to +11.07 ms |
Not significant | |
RCT |
80 people |
Mean weight gain (kg)
12 weeks
3.5 kg with amisulpride (100–800 mg/day) 4.7 kg with olanzapine (10–20 mg/day) |
P <0.001 |
Effect size not calculated | amisulpride |
RCT |
80 people |
Proportion of people with 1 treatment-emergent adverse effect
68% with amisulpride (100–800 mg/day) 48% with olanzapine (10–20 mg/day) Absolute numbers not reported |
P = 0.113 |
Not significant |