Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Med. 2011 Jun;13(6):569–575. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318211a9c2

Table 1.

Participant characteristics within each study

Pilot interviews (%) Web survey (%) Follow-up interviews (%)
Highest degree
 MD 7 (50.00) 21 (26.25) 4 (33.33)
 PhD 5 (35.71) 38 (47.50) 7 (58.33)
 MD-PhD 2 (14.29) 3 (3.75) 1 (8.33)
 Othera 0 (0.00) 9 (11.25) 0 (0.00)
 Missing 0 (0.00) 9 (11.25) 0 (0.00)
Role in studyb
 PI/Co-PI 14 (100.00)c 33 (41.25) 9 (75.00)
 Coinvestigator 0 (0.00) 21 (26.25) 3 (25.00)
 Other team member 0 (0.00) 18 (22.50) 0 (0.00)
 Other role 0 (0.00) 8 (10.00) 0 (0.00)
Affiliation
 Medicine (Not asked) 48 (60.00) 7 (58.33)
 Dentistry 5 (6.25) 3 (25.00)
 Public health 8 (10.00) 1 (8.33)
 Other/unspecified 9 (11.25) 1 (8.33)
 Missing 10 (1.25) 0 (0.00)
Database size (number of individual donors)
 1–100 donors (Not asked) 25 (31.25) 3 (25.00)
 101–1000 donors 22 (27.50) 1 (8.33)
 1001–5000 donors 15 (18.75) 5 (41.67)
 >5000 donors 3 (3.75) 2 (16.67)
 Missing 15 (18.75) 1 (8.33)
Total 14 (100.00) 80 (100.00) 12 (100.00)

The values are represented as frequency (%). Percentages may not total to 100 due to rounding.

a

“Other” degree included RN, MS, MPH, and BS.

b

Or role with greatest responsibility for the study when more than one role is mentioned.

c

Participants in the pilot interviews were all PIs since the sample was taken from the CRISP database.

PI, Principal Investigator.